Dog bites can be scary and unexpected. In California, dog bite cases are often filed when someone is injured by a dog and seeks compensation for their injuries. However, not all dog bite cases are clear-cut, and there are many defenses that dog owners can raise. Understanding the possible defenses can help you know what to expect if you are dealing with a dog bite case in California. This guide will walk you through some of the most common defenses used by dog owners and what it means for your case. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates provides dedicated legal support to help victims of dog bites seek fair compensation for their injuries and related expenses.
California’s Strict Liability Law
In California, the law regarding dog bites is strict liability. This means that a dog owner is usually held responsible if their dog bites someone, even if the dog has never bitten anyone before or shown any signs of aggression. The law is in place to protect people from the dangers that come with dog bites. However, strict liability does not mean that a dog owner has no defenses. There are situations where the dog owner may not be held responsible for a bite, and these defenses can play a major role in the outcome of the case.
Defending a Dog Bite Case
While California’s strict liability law seems straightforward, it does not guarantee that a dog owner will always be liable for a bite. In dog bite cases, the defense may argue several factors to reduce or eliminate their responsibility. These defenses can complicate the case and make it more challenging for the injured party to receive compensation.
Trespassing
One of the most common defenses in a dog bite case is trespassing. If the person who was bitten was unlawfully on the dog owner’s property, the dog owner may argue that they are not liable for the injuries. California law states that dog owners are not responsible for bites that occur when the victim is trespassing. This means that if someone is on private property without permission and is bitten by a dog, the owner may not have to pay for the injuries. Trespassing is a powerful defense because it shows that the injured person was in a place where they should not have been, which can reduce the dog owner’s responsibility.
Founding Attorney
Timothy J. Ryan
Provocation of the Dog
Another defense that may be raised in a dog bite case is provocation. Provocation happens when the injured person does something to make the dog react in a way that leads to the bite. For example, if someone teases, hits, or threatens a dog, the dog may feel the need to protect itself or its owner. If the dog bite was caused by the actions of the victim, the dog owner may not be liable for the injury. The courts will look at the situation closely to determine if the bite was a reasonable reaction to the provocation. Provocation is an important defense because it shows that the dog was not acting aggressively without cause.
Comparative Negligence
In some cases, the injured person may be partially responsible for the dog bite. This is called comparative negligence. Comparative negligence means that the victim’s actions contributed to their injuries in some way. For instance, if the person approached the dog without permission or ignored warning signs that the dog was aggressive, the court may decide that the victim is partially at fault. In California, even if the victim is found to be partly responsible, they can still recover damages. However, the amount they receive may be reduced based on their level of responsibility for the bite. This defense allows dog owners to argue that they should not be fully responsible for the injury.
Got a really bad head concussion and Timothy J. Ryan & Associates was amazing.” Tim helped me to stop stressing out about my case and focus my attention back on my work and family. Tim is one of the smartest men I have ever met. This personal injury law firm changed my life. They did not disappoint in any way. The entire office was professional and friendly! You can trust this firm. Highly recommend. ” - Flex Drill Tim is personable, knowledgeable in law and interested in you as a person, Tim stayed on top of my case and kept me updated frequently. His staff (Sose and Katelyn were outstanding and worked closely with me to get things done. I would recommend this law firm." - Leslie Bartimore Very efficient and professional personnel. Starting from the top to bottom. The experience was great. Being Hispanic was really happy seen how they were able to handle cases with all different ethnicities. The treatment I got from Tim and the legal assistant was beyond awesome. Super happy with the settlement and the outputs of my case. Thanks a lot Tim and Tania." - Rafael Sarabia
Assumption of Risk
In certain situations, a dog owner may claim that the injured person assumed the risk of being bitten. This defense applies when the victim knew there was a risk of being bitten but chose to interact with the dog anyway. For example, if someone is warned that a dog is dangerous but continues to approach or play with the dog, the dog owner might argue that the victim took on the risk voluntarily. This defense is often used when the injured person was aware of the dog’s behavior but still decided to engage with it. The courts will examine the circumstances to decide if the assumption of risk defense applies.
The Dog was Protecting Its Owner or Property
Dogs are often protective of their owners and their homes. If a dog bites someone because it was protecting its owner or property, the dog owner may argue that the dog’s actions were justified. California law allows dogs to defend their owners in certain situations, especially if the dog believes its owner is in danger. If the bite occurred while the dog was protecting its owner from what it perceived as a threat, the courts may consider this a valid defense. However, the dog owner must prove that the dog was acting reasonably in defense of the person or property.
No Actual Injury
Another possible defense in a dog bite case is that the victim did not suffer any real injuries. For someone to file a successful dog bite claim, they must show that they were physically harmed by the bite. If the dog did not break the skin or cause any serious injury, the dog owner might argue that there is no basis for the claim. The courts will review medical records and other evidence to determine whether the bite caused actual harm. If there is no proof of injury, the case may be dismissed or result in minimal damages.
Police or Military Dogs
Dogs that work for law enforcement or the military are treated differently under California law. These dogs are often trained to protect and apprehend suspects. If a police or military dog bites someone while performing its duties, the dog’s handler may not be liable for the injury. However, there are limits to this defense. The bite must occur while the dog is following its training and carrying out its duties in a lawful manner. If the bite happens outside of these circumstances, the handler could still be held responsible.
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney
Personal Injury Case Timeline
Related Videos
The Importance of Evidence in Dog Bite Defenses
In any dog bite case, the strength of the defense will depend on the evidence presented. For a defense to succeed, the dog owner must provide proof to support their claim. This could include witness statements, security footage, medical records, and any other relevant information. Gathering evidence is crucial in dog bite cases because it helps paint a clear picture of what happened during the incident. If you are involved in a dog bite case, whether as the injured person or the dog owner, having solid evidence can greatly affect the outcome.
What to Expect if a Defense is Raised
If you are involved in a dog bite case and the dog owner raises a defense, it is important to understand that it can change the course of your case. A defense may reduce the amount of compensation you can receive or, in some cases, completely prevent you from recovering damages. The courts will carefully review the evidence from both sides to determine if the defense is valid. The process can be lengthy, and having a clear understanding of your rights and options is crucial.
Case Results
If you are seeking compensation after a dog bite, it is helpful to work with an attorney who is experienced in handling dog bite cases. A knowledgeable attorney can help you navigate the complexities of the case and understand how defenses may impact your claim. They can also help you gather the necessary evidence to support your case and ensure that you have the best chance of receiving fair compensation.
If you or a loved one has been bitten by a dog and are facing challenges with the defenses raised in your case, you do not have to go through it alone. The legal process can be complicated, especially when dealing with defenses that may reduce or eliminate the responsibility of the dog owner. At Timothy J. Ryan & Associates, we are committed to helping victims of dog bites navigate their legal options and fight for the compensation they deserve. Contact our team today to discuss your case and find out how we can assist you in achieving the best possible outcome for your situation.