When someone suffers a catastrophic injury in California, it often leads to long-lasting physical, emotional, and financial challenges. Catastrophic injuries, such as traumatic brain injuries, severe spinal cord damage, or serious burns, can completely change someone’s life and the lives of those around them. These injuries might leave a person needing lifetime care or ongoing medical treatments, which can be incredibly costly. Victims in these cases frequently look to the court system to help them receive fair compensation for the damages they have endured.
Unfortunately, in many of these cases, the party responsible for causing the injury (often called the defendant) may not readily admit fault. Defendants, or their insurance companies, use a variety of strategies to defend themselves and reduce or avoid their responsibility. Knowing the common defense strategies used in California catastrophic injury cases can help victims understand what to expect and work closely with their legal team to counter these defenses. In this page, we’ll explore these strategies and how an experienced legal team, such as Timothy J. Ryan & Associates, can address them. At, Timothy J. Ryan & Associates, we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.
Claiming Comparative Negligence
In many catastrophic injury cases, defendants often try to argue that the victim is partly or fully responsible for their own injuries. In California, this argument falls under the law of “comparative negligence.” Under this law, a person’s compensation can be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. For example, if a judge or jury decides that the victim was 20 percent responsible for their injuries, then the amount of compensation the victim can receive will be reduced by 20 percent.
Defendants may bring up comparative negligence by presenting evidence or witnesses that suggest the victim acted in a way that contributed to their own harm. For instance, if someone was injured in a car accident, the defendant might argue that the injured person was distracted or speeding. To counter these claims, a strong legal team will work to present evidence that minimizes or eliminates the victim’s fault. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates understands how crucial it is to counter these arguments effectively and will work hard to protect the rights of their clients.
Arguing Assumption of Risk
Another common defense tactic in catastrophic injury cases is the assumption of risk argument. This defense claims that the victim knew about the risks involved in an activity and voluntarily chose to take those risks anyway. For example, if someone was injured while participating in a sport or recreational activity, the defendant might argue that the injured person was aware of the possibility of injury.
In California, assumption of risk can be used as a defense in some cases, especially when the activity is known to involve certain dangers. However, this defense is not always valid, particularly if the defendant’s behavior went beyond what is reasonably expected within the activity. An effective legal team will gather evidence to show that the defendant’s actions were reckless or negligent, even within a risky activity. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates will work diligently to protect clients from unfair assumptions of risk defenses and make sure that the focus remains on the defendant’s behavior.
Denying Causation
Another defense strategy that defendants frequently use in catastrophic injury cases is to deny causation. This means that the defendant argues that their actions did not cause the injury, or that the injury was due to some other factor, not their conduct. For instance, a defendant in a slip-and-fall case might claim that the injury was caused by the victim’s existing medical condition rather than the accident itself.
To support this defense, defendants often use medical records, witnesses, or other forms of evidence to suggest that the injury could have been caused by a pre-existing condition or unrelated event. To address this, an experienced legal team will collect medical records, witness statements, and testimonies to show a clear connection between the defendant’s actions and the injury. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates are skilled at demonstrating causation, ensuring that victims receive compensation for injuries directly caused by another’s negligence.
Minimizing Damages
In addition to denying responsibility, some defendants may try to reduce the amount of compensation the victim could receive by minimizing the severity of the damages. In catastrophic injury cases, damages are often significant because of the ongoing medical treatment and long-term impacts on the victim’s life. The defendant’s legal team may attempt to downplay these damages by suggesting that the injury is not as serious as claimed or that the victim does not need the level of care or compensation being sought.
To minimize damages, defendants might present medical specialists or financial analysts to argue that the victim’s treatment costs or lost earnings are exaggerated. They may also suggest that the victim’s injuries will not impact their quality of life as severely as claimed. An experienced attorney will work with medical specialists and economic analysts to present a strong case for the real costs and impacts of the injury on the victim’s life. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates understands how to counter these tactics by providing thorough documentation of the actual damages, ensuring the victim is fully compensated.
Related Videos
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney
Personal Injury Case Timeline
Disputing the Need for Future Medical Treatment
In many catastrophic injury cases, the injured person may require ongoing or future medical treatment due to the long-lasting nature of their injuries. Defendants may try to dispute the necessity of this future care in order to lower the compensation amount. They might argue that the victim’s condition has improved or that future treatments are speculative and unnecessary.
To support these claims, defendants often hire medical professionals to testify that the victim’s condition does not require the projected future care. A legal team representing the victim will need to gather testimony from the victim’s doctors, medical specialists, and possibly even life-care planners who specialize in calculating future medical costs. By carefully presenting evidence that demonstrates the need for continued treatment, Timothy J. Ryan & Associates can challenge these defenses and make sure clients receive the care they deserve.
Using Delays to Pressure the Victim
Sometimes, defense teams may use delays as a tactic to pressure the victim into settling for a lower amount. They may request postponements, file multiple motions, or use other legal maneuvers to slow down the case’s progress. For a victim who is struggling financially due to medical bills or loss of income, these delays can be particularly stressful.
The goal of this strategy is often to make the victim feel that a lengthy, exhausting process is unavoidable and that settling for less might bring faster relief. A committed legal team will work to keep the case moving forward, addressing delay tactics and showing the court that the defense is acting in bad faith. At Timothy J. Ryan & Associates, the focus is on helping clients avoid unnecessary delays so they can receive the justice they need.
Challenging the Severity of Emotional Distress Claims
In catastrophic injury cases, emotional distress is a significant part of the victim’s suffering. The lasting impact on mental health and emotional well-being is often substantial. Some defense teams may argue that the victim’s emotional distress is exaggerated or unrelated to the incident. They may even try to suggest that the distress is due to other factors in the victim’s life, unrelated to the injury.
To counter these arguments, an attorney will gather statements from the victim’s mental health providers and may even bring in specialists in psychology or psychiatry. They will show how the traumatic event and the resulting physical injury have caused emotional harm, emphasizing the deep and often lifelong impact on the victim’s life. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates understand the significance of emotional distress and are dedicated to making sure their clients’ suffering is fully recognized in court.
Navigating the defense strategies in catastrophic injury cases can be challenging. California’s legal system allows defendants a wide range of defenses, many of which can feel overwhelming to those seeking justice. Victims often need a strong legal advocate to face these tactics and effectively present their case. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates brings a deep understanding of these defense strategies to each case, working hard to defend clients against unfair claims and minimize the burden placed on them.
If you or a loved one has suffered a catastrophic injury and are facing challenges from defense strategies, it’s essential to have a team dedicated to protecting your rights. Contact Timothy J. Ryan & Associates for support in pursuing the compensation you deserve. Their team is ready to help you face these obstacles with confidence and strength.