How Surveillance Can Affect Your California Workers’ Comp Claim

When workers are injured on the job, they may qualify for benefits under California’s workers’ compensation system. This support helps with medical costs and provides some financial relief while employees recover. But while workers’ compensation is intended to help employees who genuinely need it, the system can also be challenging, and workers should be careful about certain factors that may impact their claims. One of these factors is surveillance. Surveillance is often used by insurance companies to verify or dispute claims, and understanding how it works can be important for any worker going through the process. At, Timothy J. Ryan & Associates , we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.

2021badge10best
2021badge10best

What is Surveillance in Workers’ Compensation Cases?

Surveillance in workers’ compensation cases is when insurance companies or employers use methods to monitor injured workers. This is often done to make sure workers are truthful about their injuries. If there is any doubt about the injury, insurers may use surveillance to see if the worker’s daily activities match their injury claims. Surveillance can include many techniques, such as following the worker, taking photos, or even recording video footage. All these methods are meant to determine if the worker’s activities align with what they reported in their workers’ compensation claim.

This monitoring can take place in different locations. Surveillance might be done in public places, like at the grocery store, outside your home, or even at social events. Sometimes, social media can also become part of surveillance when investigators look for posts or photos that may show a worker doing activities they claimed they could not perform.

Why Do Insurance Companies Use Surveillance?

Insurance companies use surveillance because they want to ensure that only workers with genuine injuries receive compensation. Workers’ compensation claims can cost companies a significant amount of money, and they have an interest in verifying the accuracy of each claim. Insurance companies worry about fraud, and even though most workers are honest, some may exaggerate their injuries. By using surveillance, insurers aim to identify false claims and limit payouts to only those cases that truly deserve compensation.

In addition, insurance companies believe that surveillance can discourage claimants from attempting any form of fraud. If a worker knows they might be monitored, they may be more likely to be honest about their injuries. In many ways, surveillance serves as a warning and an investigation tool for insurers to confirm that claimants are telling the truth.

Timothy J. Ryan

Founding Attorney

Common Types of Surveillance Methods Used

There are several ways insurance companies may conduct surveillance on a worker with a claim. One common type is direct physical surveillance. This is when an investigator follows the worker to watch their activities in person. Investigators may wait outside the worker’s home or near places they frequently visit to see if there are any contradictions between the worker’s claim and their physical actions.

Another method is video or photographic surveillance. In this type, investigators might record videos or take photos of the worker doing activities that they say they cannot perform. For example, if a worker has claimed an injury that prevents lifting objects, but they are seen carrying grocery bags, the insurance company might use that footage against the worker.

Social media surveillance is becoming more common. Insurers may check the worker’s social media accounts to see if there are any photos, videos, or comments that indicate they are less injured than reported. For instance, if a worker posts pictures of themselves on vacation or doing physical activities, this could raise suspicion. Social media posts are often public and accessible, making it easy for insurers to monitor claimants without direct contact.

How Surveillance May Impact Your Claim

Surveillance can have a significant impact on a workers’ compensation claim, especially if there is a contradiction between what was reported in the claim and what is seen in surveillance footage. If surveillance shows a worker doing activities they said they could not do because of their injury, the insurance company may challenge the claim. This can lead to delays, reduced benefits, or even denial of the claim altogether.

For example, if a worker reports severe back pain that prevents them from lifting anything heavy, but surveillance shows them carrying heavy bags or performing physical tasks, the insurance company might argue that the injury is not as serious as stated. This can create doubt in the validity of the claim, and the insurer may take action to limit or deny the benefits. Even if the worker is not engaging in activities that directly contradict their claim, surveillance footage showing them participating in any physical activities could lead the insurer to question the severity of the injury.

Another impact of surveillance is that it may influence how much compensation the worker receives. If an insurance company believes a worker’s activities show they are less injured than reported, they may try to reduce the compensation amount. This can place financial strain on workers who genuinely need the full benefit amount to cover their medical bills and other expenses.

Quote

Got a really bad head concussion and Timothy J. Ryan & Associates was amazing.” Tim helped me to stop stressing out about my case and focus my attention back on my work and family. Tim is one of the smartest men I have ever met. This personal injury law firm changed my life. They did not disappoint in any way. The entire office was professional and friendly! You can trust this firm. Highly recommend. ”

- Flex Drill

Quote

Tim is personable, knowledgeable in law and interested in you as a person, Tim stayed on top of my case and kept me updated frequently. His staff (Sose and Katelyn were outstanding and worked closely with me to get things done. I would recommend this law firm."

- Leslie Bartimore

Quote

Very efficient and professional personnel. Starting from the top to bottom. The experience was great. Being Hispanic was really happy seen how they were able to handle cases with all different ethnicities. The treatment I got from Tim and the legal assistant was beyond awesome. Super happy with the settlement and the outputs of my case. Thanks a lot Tim and Tania."

- Rafael Sarabia

What Injured Workers Can Do to Protect Their Claim

Knowing that surveillance can be used by insurance companies, it is important for injured workers to be cautious with their actions and statements during the claims process. Workers should make sure that they are truthful about their injuries from the beginning, accurately describing the extent of their pain and limitations. Any exaggeration, even if unintended, can be problematic if surveillance shows activities that seem inconsistent with the claim.

Another way to protect the claim is by being mindful of social media. Even innocent posts, like a family gathering or a photo with friends, can be misinterpreted by an insurance company. It may be helpful to avoid posting any new pictures or updates on social media until the claim is resolved. It is also a good idea to keep privacy settings high on all social media accounts so that only trusted friends and family can see any posts. Remember that even indirect actions, like friends tagging you in posts, could be viewed by insurers.

In public spaces, workers should also be careful about physical activities that might contradict their injury claim. Simple actions, like lifting grocery bags or playing with children, can seem harmless but may give insurers a reason to question the severity of the injury. Staying within the physical limitations advised by a doctor can help keep the claim secure.

Related Videos

Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney

Personal Injury Case Timeline

Can Surveillance Be Challenged in a Workers’ Compensation Case?

In some cases, surveillance evidence may be inaccurate or misleading. Workers have the right to challenge surveillance if it does not reflect their true situation. For instance, surveillance might capture a single moment that does not show the full extent of the injury. A person might be able to lift something one day but suffer more pain afterward, which the surveillance may not capture.

Legal representation can help workers address surveillance issues. If a worker believes that surveillance has unfairly impacted their claim, they may be able to dispute it with the help of a lawyer. A lawyer can help show how isolated actions do not accurately reflect the worker’s injury and ensure that the worker’s true limitations are presented to the court or claims adjuster.

The Importance of Accurate Medical Documentation

Another crucial part of the claims process is thorough medical documentation. If a worker is following a treatment plan, attending doctor appointments, and has a complete record of medical visits, this can support their claim. Detailed medical records show the real effects of the injury and can help counter any surveillance used to dispute the claim.

Medical documentation is valuable because it provides objective evidence from medical professionals about the injury and its impact. If there is a conflict between surveillance footage and medical records, the documentation from doctors can often weigh more heavily in favor of the worker’s claim. For this reason, it is essential for workers to attend all medical appointments, follow through with recommended treatments, and keep clear records of any issues related to their injury.

Case Results

$131,000,000

Judgment against the Ford Motor Co. on behalf of a New York Mets prospect killed in a 2001 rollover accident while leaving spring training.

$8,000,000

Car accident verdict obtained, despite the client being rejected by three other personal injury law firms.

$5,500,000

Car accident verdict against a tour guide company, auto manufacturer, and tire supplier.

$4,500,000

Car accident verdict for four (4) students on a cross-country travel tour that were ejected from a van in a rollover accident.

$4,200,000

Premises liability verdict for a worker at a cement plant that fell through a hole in the roof.

$3,500,000

Car accident settlement for a client that was seriously injured after colliding with improperly placed barrels on the freeway.

Why Legal Assistance Matters in Workers’ Compensation Claims

Navigating a workers’ compensation claim can be difficult, especially when surveillance is involved. Legal guidance can be helpful to understand how surveillance may impact a case and to protect the worker’s rights. A lawyer can help explain the claims process, prepare the worker for possible surveillance, and respond to any surveillance footage that seems unfair or misleading.

When workers face challenges in their claims, especially with surveillance, having an experienced lawyer on their side can make a significant difference. Legal professionals understand the tactics insurance companies may use and can help counter them effectively. This support is crucial for workers who may feel overwhelmed by the claims process or worried about their benefits being jeopardized due to surveillance.

If you are filing a workers’ compensation claim in California and are concerned about surveillance or other tactics that could impact your case, seeking legal assistance can be a wise choice. Timothy J. Ryan & Associates is dedicated to helping injured workers navigate the claims process and address any issues related to surveillance. Our team is here to support you, protect your rights, and work toward a positive outcome for your claim. Reach out to Timothy J. Ryan & Associates today for compassionate, knowledgeable assistance with your workers’ compensation case.